Crossfit fans who don’t crossfit… You piss me off!!!

Just a small rant. I have had enough and I can’t take it anymore. As we all know, crossfit can be a fine way to workout and even enhance your athletic ability in some cases. Most crossfitters will tell you that crossfit is the best training program ever. While I disagree with this statement on the principle of relativity, I do understand their argument : They love their training as much as I love mine. And, this, my friends, is gold.

Read more of this post

Paleo dogma bullshit

This post was inspired by the latest post of Primal Toad (link here). Now, I’m not calling out Primal toad but the whole ideology that he shares -with many paleo enthusiast- that conventional wisdom is always wrong (Interestingly enough, science is always wrong when you don’t study it) and that if something is not demonstrated (or at least badly demonstrated) to be detrimental to your health, it must be healthy. If it’s healthy, then we have to eat these foods in very large amounts. Amounts that are not necessarily natural (they require you to go out of your way to get more of these foods in). Toad posted mainly about saturated fat and cholesterol which is what I will base my short rebuttal on.

I find the data to be insufficient -or at least conflicting- to make conclusions about saturated fats and cholesterol. Yes, you need both of them. No, it’s probably not the most intelligent idea ever to focus on getting as much of it as possible.

By this, I mean that cholesterol and saturated fat should not exclusively be the reason why you consume certain foods. For instance, egg is a wonderful food because of its high vitamin content, protein content and availability as well as overall energy. It is not  a great food because of it’s cholesterol content but because of the reason I have listed. Before you go all crazy and start cursing like a pirate (or like a caveman since most of my readership are just modern cavemen/woman), let me tell you that I’m known for my ability to eat 10 eggs (cooked in butter) as a breakfast. That means I’m not afraid of the stuff nor am I preaching a low fat, low animal products diet. What I am preaching is common sense and objectivity.

I eat them for the protein and energy. Not the cholesterol.

Still the point is, you gotta be careful with the way you deal with things and the message you send to the world. Low fat (30% of your calories as fat, as is advised) is technically not a problem at all. High carb (60-70% of your calories as carbs, as is advised) is technically not a problem at all. Plenty of epidemiology studies demonstrate this. I know, this type of studies sucks…except when you pull one about eskimos or another tribe, right?

Really, as long as you pick foods that you seem to do well on (aka foods you pick in nature for the most part), you are doing fine. For some it means a high meat diet. For others, it can be a diet lower in meat. My theory is that it’s all about the quality of the food you eat instead of the composition of the diet itself (macro nutrient, etc). Obviously, if we are going to use an evolutionary perspective, this make sense. Macro nutrients were cycled. Feast and famine. And sometimes the feast would involve stuffing your skinny ass with potatoes (a strategy that has persisted till today and made humans survive quite well actually). On the other end, quality was rarely an issue. It’s not like you would find mutant foods in an environment that was NOT dominated by humans.

This brings us to paleo dogma bullshit that plague the internet world the way freaking vegetarians seem to be everywhere around here. I get to hear their rhetoric bullshit in my nutrition class as well as at the metro station where they want us to sign some peta petitions. Same shit, different smell. All opinions, no fact.

The supposed idea of a perfect diet is ridiculous for various reasons : (a) not everyone is the same (genetics, etc.) (b) not everyone do the same thing (sleep, lifestyle, job, etc.) (c) not everyone is active (no matter what the so called paleo exercise haters tell you, exercise is a must and it will greatly enhance various processes that we are actually trying to improve with diet…insulin sensitivity, blood pressure, etc.) (d) not everyone as access to the same resources (foods or money). (e) everyone has a different health record.

I’m not a scientist (yet…but nutrition is not the field I will be studying) but from my less than optimally educated perspective, the only thing that has been demonstrated -either by scientific facts or by anecdotal experience is that a diet as natural (hunter gatherer style) as possible usually make people healthier.

/rant

There goes your cholesterol theory

As I said earlier this month, I will be posting a bit more studies and science posts.

Here is a study from the Department of Nutritional Sciences of University of Connecticut about eggs, cholesterol, metabolic syndrome & restricted carbohydrate diet. Another nail in the coffin of the cholesterol myth?

Abstract

Carbohydrate-restricted diets (CRD) significantly decrease body weight and independently improve plasma triglycerides (TG) and HDL cholesterol (HDL-C). Increasing intake of dietary cholesterol from eggs in the context of a low-fat diet maintains the LDL cholesterol (LDL-C)/HDL-C for both hyper- and hypo-responders to dietary cholesterol. In this study, 28 overweight/obese male subjects (BMI = 25-37 kg/m2) aged 40-70 y were recruited to evaluate the contribution of dietary cholesterol from eggs in a CRD. Subjects were counseled to consume a CRD (10-15% energy from carbohydrate) and they were randomly allocated to the EGG group [intake of 3 eggs per day (640 mg/d additional dietary cholesterol)] or SUB group [equivalent amount of egg substitute (0 dietary cholesterol) per day]. Energy intake decreased in both groups from 10,243 +/- 4040 to 7968 +/- 2401 kJ (P < 0.05) compared with baseline. All subjects irrespective of their assigned group had reduced body weight and waist circumference (P < 0.0001). Similarly, the plasma TG concentration was reduced from 1.34 +/- 0.66 to 0.83 +/- 0.30 mmol/L after 12 wk (P < 0.001) in all subjects. The plasma LDL-C concentration, as well as the LDL-C:HDL-C ratio, did not change during the intervention. In contrast, plasma HDL-C concentration increased in the EGG group from 1.23 +/- 0.39 to 1.47 +/- 0.38 mmol/L (P < 0.01), whereas HDL-C did not change in the SUB group. Plasma glucose concentrations in fasting subjects did not change. Eighteen subjects were classified as having the metabolic syndrome (MetS) at the beginning of the study, whereas 3 subjects had that classification at the end. These results suggest that including eggs in a CRD results in increased HDL-C while decreasing the risk factors associated with MetS.

Source

HDL is what we consider the ”good” cholesterol. Supposedly, it gets rid of LDL cholesterol. According to Michael W. King, Ph.D  of IU School of Medicine, ”The liver synthesizes VLDLs and these are converted to LDLs through the action of endothelial cell-associated lipoprotein lipase. Cholesterol found in plasma membranes can be extracted by HDLs and esterified by the HDL-associated enzyme LCAT. The cholesterol acquired from peripheral tissues by HDLs can then be transferred to VLDLs and LDLs via the action of cholesteryl ester transfer protein (apo-D) which is associated with HDLs. Reverse cholesterol transport allows peripheral cholesterol to be returned to the liver in LDLs. Ultimately, cholesterol is excreted in the bile as free cholesterol or as bile salts following conversion to bile acids in the liver.”

I’m late to the party… Happy new year

May you all be healthy and happy!

I want to take a minute to thank all of my readers. I also want to thank everybody who commented on my posts and made this experience fun and worth it. I swear I will be more present in 2011.

The blog might change it’s orientation a bit. I’m thinking about putting the focus of the blog on other topics than nutrition as I feel pretty much everything as been covered. I have also reached a point where I feel that nutrition science gets way too much attention for what it really is. I feel like it’s more of a belief-oriented ”science”. This is the case for all nutrition community, paleo included.

What I really want to do is write posts about topics that I feel are often ignored, yet very interesting (however, some bloggers do a good job at covering some of them). These topics include psychology, neurology, sociology, biology (how funny is it that we only rarely talk about the evolutionary part of ”evolutionary nutrition”) and more. By no means I am an expert on these topics but I expect to have a good discussion with you all. May be we can all learn something from each other and make this year the best. Really, commenter are the only reason I’m still dedicating time to this blog. I have stated in about every post : I like to debate and I love a good discussion. To quote Aristotle, ”Man is by nature a political animal.”

So, here is to you, my friends, Happy new year!


Why nutrition science sucks and why there is more to curing a cancer than eating veggies

Money > Health

As time goes by, nutrition science is getting more and more popular . I remember when I first got interested by nutrition, I was amazed at how little [good] information about food was available. Most of the information available was based on myth, beliefs and pseudo theories. Unfortunately, little has changed since then. At the time, I was looking for a way to improve my performance in the gym. I was very underweight and I had a pathetic level of strength. I wasn’t pleased about my slow progress and I figured that the quality -instead of the quantity- of calories I was eating might play a bigger role. A few years later, I’m amazed at how popular (how mainstream) nutrition has become when you consider how limited  progress we  made since the golden age of nutrition (The era of vitamin discoveries).

Read more of this post

Chuck Palaniuk’s view on civilization (Quotes from Lullaby)

Chuck is by far one of my favourite author. All his books are unique, very funny and they describe how pathetic we can be from times to times. I am not really a fan of most fiction books ( I prefer to read books that will teach me something) but Chuck’s books are just too good to not be read. I figured posting a long quote from his book Lullaby (published in 2002) would be a great way to end the week. Hey, we don’t have to be serious all the time! Also, we don’t have to always talk about science and paleo! It’s a light read so enjoy!

Read more of this post

The global paleo conversion movement idea is a joke

Even though I have been pretty busy in the last couple of weeks, I still managed to stay updated on most paleo matters (read : read my favourite blogs/authors). One thing that really pissed me off was the idea that we need a world wide paleo movement to convert (not educate on nutrition matters)  people to the paleo way of life. There is no doubt that such an idea would benefits the three or four book writers in the paleo sphere. But, would it really benefit the entire population?

Read more of this post

Fasting and [the modification] of human behavior (and more)

I'm back from the death (Hey, you know me, I had to poke some fun at religion)

Surprise, surprise, I’m still alive. Yes I know, it has been such a long time since I last posted anything on here. Even more surprising is the fact that my traffic has improved. I would like to thank everyone who has been reading Primal Journal. I really appreciate it. Now, I have been thinking about a great way to make a come back and I just did not know what I should write about (too many ideas!). I finally decided to write about an aspect of fasting that I still have not seen covered.

Read more of this post

Carbs for thought

Tubers : The evil kid.

Today, as I write this post in a fasting state (Skipping breakfast is now the only way to have some free time in the morning), I am looking for your input. I must repeat that this blog is both about sharing and learning. If you have been reading my blog for the past few months, you know what my stance on carbs (natural : tubers, fruits, veggies, etc.) is : they are not evil! [Link here and here]. So, today is about sharing a theory/hypothesis with you guys. If you have any insight on the subject, please don’t hesitate to share it.

Read more of this post

Ah these food junkies… Sugar is more addictive than Cocaine

Thanks mate for helping us understand our own biological problems.

I had to leave the blogsphere for a while due to my studies. Now that I am starting to have a life again (slowly but surely), I can start to read, write, and explore ideas again. After a great discussion about how natural selection and adaptation gave us a pre-existing preference for salt, sugar and fat with my neurology Professor’s colleague, I was referred to a paper that I would like to discuss today. For one, the paper has been completely ignored by the evolutionary eaters of this online world. For two, it is definitely interesting because it probably allows us to understand more precisely the obesity epidemic and food addiction. Food addiction is a problem that is too often ignored.

Read more of this post

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 32 other followers